Their suit, trying to block the rescission of President Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals amnesty, is really a textbook situation of “the finish justifies the means.” The Metabolic rate can’t be permitted to face when it comes to their policy objectives.
Not to mention, no reflexive Democratic defense of Obama’s 2012 executive overreach could be complete with no obligatory liberal dog whistle of “racism.” (Let alone that being Hispanic is definitely an ethnicity, and never a race.)
You’ve heard about outcome-based education? This really is nothing otherwise outcome-based adjudication.
That’s what 16 Democratic attorneys general are basically promoting in protecting the so-known as “Dreamers,” the kids of illegal immigrants surreptitiously tucked across our southern border. Like shoplifting, it’s illegal, speculate they were given in, they will be able to stay.
Twenty-six Republican condition attorneys general effectively challenged DAPA, and nine of these had threatened to consider DACA to the court had the Trump administration not pulled the plug onto it by Sept. 5.