We do not know once the next Carrington-like event will occur, however a 2012 paper suggested a ten percent possibility of one happening within the next decade. Indeed, as an earthquake-prone city built above a set of conflicting fault lines, it’s only dependent on time before our world is hit through the newest One. And in addition, we’re becoming more and more susceptible to these occasions because of steady technological advances.
When it comes to prescribed solution—the magnetic deflector—Sandberg states it’s essentially a “backup magnetic field,” and, like a megascale engineering problem, “not too daunting.”
The authors repeat the cost from the magnetic deflector resembles the all inclusive costs from the Worldwide Space Station, which sturdy 3 to 4 orders of magnitude less expensive than the present global GDP—or the economical damage from the flare within 100 years time. But that’s when we use material from Earth. It might make more economic sense to construct the superstructure using materials obtained from the asteroid belt.
Using these potentially catastrophic losses in your mind, Lingam and Loeb use potential solutions. Unsurprisingly, the suggested minimization strategies aren’t subtle, but from the three solutions considered, just one was considered viable through the researchers.
This Earth-sized “magnetic deflector” could be placed in the Lagrange L1 point between your Earth and also the Sun far away of approximately 205,000 miles (329,000 km) from your planet’s surface. It might behave as a present loop, and deflect the sun’s dangerous particles back to space. They repeat the needed quantity of deflective pressure is comparatively small, and now we curently have a lot of we’ve got the technology needed to make this a reality. The large challenge, they are saying, is to scale up to the superstructural size.
[A pre-print of the paper can be obtained at arXiv]