The map compares, on the county level, the proportion of votes Trump acquired using the average share of people signed up for State medicaid programs along with other low-earnings health programs between 2011 and 2015, which likely undercounts State medicaid programs recipients because the program has expanded more recently.1

It’s been contended the Trump voters during these districts supported him simply because they resented all of the State medicaid programs users around them as welfare scroungers. But it’s difficult to sustain that argument. For just one factor, the green splashes over the map show there are many places with large State medicaid programs populations that selected Trump’s rival. And anyway, Trump themself frequently vowed to not cut State medicaid programs spending—a promise that, when the bill passes, will grow to be a bait-and-switch.

An $834 billion cut to State medicaid programs, the government’s medical health insurance for that poor, may be the greatest single alternation in the-care bill the US House of Representatives passed in May and also the US Senate is presently thinking about. The Congressional Budget Office believed this cut could leave 14 million more low-earnings Americans without coverage by 2026 than would certainly function as the situation.

In which you see fast and crimson counties, then, the thing is locations that heavily backed Trump but whose poorer citizens are actually prone to see cuts for their healthcare.

The political implications of the map stretch past the president themself. Republican senators from states rich in amounts of State medicaid programs enrollment—like Ohio’s Take advantage of Portman, Pennsylvania’s Pat Toomey, Missouri’s Roy Blunt or, though it isn’t proven about this map, Alaska’s Lisa Murkowski—all have political incentives to safeguard the reduced-earnings health program, so that they may election from the bill.

Even voters who backed Trump and aren’t State medicaid programs users are still prone to have the results of these cuts. In rural areas, hospitals rely on State medicaid programs revenue to have their doorways open without that backing, even well-off individuals individuals areas might find access choose to reduced. And State medicaid programs is a huge funder of programs that fight opioid addiction along with other public-health problems that devastate entire communities.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *