Sarah Kliff: Then large amount of people lose medical health insurance. What exactly we all know about individual mandate repeal is it would cause about 13 million less individuals to have insurance, that’s based on the Congressional Budget Office analysis. Which is really because you basically begin to see the healthy people drop from the marketplace. When they’re not needed to purchase insurance, they may decide, “Guess what happens, I am likely to risk it. I am not likely to lead.” Which would result in some pretty significant insurance loss.
Ryssdal: It’s a goverment tax bill. It is a healthcare bill. Anyway, there’s a “we have seen this movie before” factor happening here, right? Because we are waiting on Sen. McCain, Sen. Murkowski, and Sen. Collins, the 3 who voted no around the original healthcare bill, to weigh in about this factor. And there isn’t any sign that they are swayed one of the ways or another.
Ryssdal: What goes on to State medicaid programs, that is a huge thing about this entire operation?
Kliff: Exactly. So many people expect you’d see something known as a dying spiral using the healthy people exiting, the rates increase or more. We have really seen a couple of states attempt to do health reform with no mandate, Washington condition within the 1990s one thinks of. They’d a dying spiral happen, plus they didn’t have insurance providers prepared to sell coverage to the people through the finish of this experiment. We all know it does not work perfectly.
Kliff: Exactly. Therefore it all works together. Tax reform, health reform, they aren’t quite separate within Washington. They appear to be intertwined.
Ryssdal: Could it be fair for me personally to return to a lot of our coverage from the healthcare bill by which I stated, “Guess what happens, the care bill, it’s really a goverment tax bill.Inch Is the fact that panning out now? Is the fact that really what we are seeing?