Seven European Union member states, including France and Spain, have urged the European Commission to maintain strict CO2 emission standards for vehicles. The group opposes proposals to weaken the 2035 ban on internal combustion engines, arguing that easing the rules would jeopardize climate objectives, energy security, and economic competitiveness.
Why are EU member states debating the 2035 combustion engine ban?
The debate centers on whether the EU should maintain a total ban on the sale of new internal combustion engine vehicles by 2035 or transition to a more flexible target. According to a document seen by Euronews, several nations fear that watering down rules will allow high-emission vehicles to remain on the road longer than planned.
The countries opposing the change—Denmark, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden—sent a letter to the EU’s executive arm. They argue that a rapid shift to electric vehicles (EVs) reduces exposure to fossil fuel price shocks and geopolitical crises. The document suggests that electrification provides a sustainable way to shield road users from volatile fuel costs.
The current debate involves a shift from a 100% zero-emission mandate to a potential target of cutting automobile-related CO2 emissions by 90% by 2035. This 10% margin could allow for certain types of hybrid or low-emission combustion technologies.
How do the proposed emission targets differ?
The conflict pits a strict zero-emission mandate against a revised target influenced by automotive industry lobbying. Following discussions among EU leaders in December, the bloc is considering a compromise that would focus on a 90% reduction in CO2 emissions rather than a complete ban on internal combustion engines.
| Policy Approach | Primary Goal | Key Argument |
|---|---|---|
| Current 2035 Ban | 100% Zero-Emission | Climate goals and energy independence. |
| 90% Reduction Target | Reduced CO2 Output | Protecting the existing automotive sector. |
Which countries are pushing to relax the rules?
Germany and Italy are leading the push to preserve their domestic automobile industries. These nations advocate for alternative methods to reduce emissions that do not require an immediate, total transition away from combustion technology.
Manfred Weber, a member of the European Parliament representing the European People’s Party, has actively campaigned to dilute the regulations. He told reporters that the party is delivering on a campaign promise to remove the combustion engine ban. Weber noted that the European Commission had previously proposed revised regulations that aligned with the EPP’s commitments.
What are the requirements for a successful EV transition?
The group of seven nations opposing the rule changes emphasized that a successful transition requires more than just mandates. They called for the EU to support the adoption of electric vehicles through two specific pillars:

- Expanded charging infrastructure: Ensuring widespread and reliable access to power.
- Affordability incentives: Reducing the cost of buying and operating EVs to make them accessible to more citizens.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current EU plan for 2035?
The current plan involves a ban on the sale of new vehicles powered by internal combustion engines to meet zero-emission targets.
Why do some countries want to change the rules?
Countries like Germany and Italy want to protect their large automotive manufacturing sectors from a sudden, forced transition.
What is the proposed alternative to the ban?
The proposed alternative is a target to cut automobile-related CO2 emissions by 90% by 2035, rather than a total ban.
What is your view on the future of the European auto industry? Do you believe the 2035 ban should remain or be adjusted? Share your thoughts in the comments below or subscribe to our newsletter for the latest policy updates.










