• Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • World
Newsy Today
news of today
News

Who pays for Newsom’s travel? Hint: It’s not always taxpayers

by Rachel Morgan News Editor February 14, 2026
written by Rachel Morgan News Editor

SACRAMENTO — Gov. Gavin Newsom addressed world leaders at the Munich Security Conference in Germany on Friday, outlining his response to shifting federal climate priorities. He stated, “I’m showing up,” a commitment demonstrated through recent trips to Brazil, Switzerland, and Germany, where he has promoted California as a global climate partner.

This international travel has prompted questions regarding funding. In many instances, the costs are not covered by taxpayers. Instead, Newsom’s international travel is financed by the California State Protocol Foundation, a nonprofit funded primarily by corporate donations and overseen by a board appointed by the governor.

Did You Know? The California State Protocol Foundation was established as a tax-exempt charity during Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s administration in 2004.

The use of nonprofits to fund gubernatorial travel dates back to the 1980s, with similar organizations created by Gov. George Deukmejian. Gov. Gray Davis increased their use in the early 2000s to cover travel, housing, and events. The foundation’s stated mission is to alleviate the financial burden on California taxpayers by covering expenses related to the state’s economic and diplomatic interests, according to Jason Elliott, a former advisor to Newsom and current board member.

Critics, however, argue that this arrangement provides corporate interests with increased influence. Donors to the foundation include healthcare companies like Centene and CVS Pharmacy, and a significant portion of revenue comes from nonprofits linked to individuals with business before the state. Carmen Balber, executive director of Consumer Watchdog, stated, “The problem with the protocol foundation and others like it is that donors to these foundations receive access to the politicians whose travel they fund.”

What is the foundation paying for?

The foundation covers the costs of Newsom’s international and some domestic travel, including trips to Climate Week in New York. It also funds travel for his staff. The governor’s office has not disclosed whether the foundation covers the cost of his security detail.

Financial disclosures show the foundation paid over $13,000 for Newsom’s 2024 trip to Italy, where he delivered a speech at the Vatican. Nearly $4,000 was spent on his trip to Mexico City for the inauguration of Claudia Sheinbaum, Mexico’s first female president. Since taking office in 2019, Newsom has reported receiving $72,000 from the foundation for travel, staff events, and holiday gatherings. The foundation also paid $15,200 for his 2023 trip to China and $8,800 for his attendance at Super Bowl LIV in Miami in 2020.

Expert Insight: The reliance on private funding for official travel raises questions about transparency and potential conflicts of interest. Even as the stated goal is to reduce the burden on taxpayers, it simultaneously creates a pathway for donors to potentially influence policy decisions through access and contributions.

The foundation reported $1.3 million in revenue in 2024, with a remaining balance of less than $8,000 after expenses.

Who are the donors behind the foundation?

Donations solicited by Newsom are recorded as “behested payments” with the Fair Political Practices Commission. Last year, Resources Legacy Fund contributed $100,000, shortly after hiring Newsom’s former mayoral chief of staff. The U.S. Energy Foundation donated $150,000 for the California delegation’s attendance at COP30 in Brazil, and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation donated $300,000 for the China trip. UC Berkeley gave $220,000 for the Vatican trip. Donations from Amazon-owned Zoox Inc. Totaled $80,000. Charities established for Newsom’s inaugurations have contributed over $5 million to the foundation since 2019, with backing from unions, corporations, and healthcare companies.

Past spending by the foundation has been criticized

A 2007 Los Angeles Times investigation revealed that during Schwarzenegger’s administration, $1.7 million in travel costs paid by the foundation were not fully disclosed. Expenses included leased jets costing up to $10,000 per hour and expensive hotel suites. Newsom’s office stated that he travels commercially, unlike his predecessor.

Frequently Asked Questions

When did California governors begin using nonprofits to fund travel?

Similar nonprofits have existed since Gov. George Deukmejian created one in the 1980s. The California State Protocol Foundation was created during Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s administration in 2004.

What is a “behested payment”?

A behested payment occurs when an elected official solicits or suggests that a person or organization offer to another person or organization for a legislative, governmental or charitable purpose, and these payments are recorded with the Fair Political Practices Commission.

How much revenue did the foundation report in 2024?

The foundation reported total revenue of $1.3 million in 2024.

As California’s governor increasingly takes on a role in international climate diplomacy, how might the funding mechanisms supporting his travel shape perceptions of the state’s priorities and influence?

February 14, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
World

Rubio’s speech to European allies strikes reassuring tone but sticks to Trump’s firm stance

by Chief Editor February 14, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Transatlantic Relations at a Crossroads: Navigating a Recent Era of Reciprocity

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s recent address at the Munich Security Conference signaled a shift in tone, offering reassurance to allies after a period of strained transatlantic relations. While maintaining the Trump administration’s firm stance on policy, Rubio’s approach contrasted sharply with the combative rhetoric of previous engagements, notably Vice President JD Vance’s address last year. This recalibration comes as the U.S. Seeks to redefine its partnerships with Europe, emphasizing “seriousness and reciprocity.”

The Demand for Reciprocity: A New Framework for Alliance

Rubio’s message underscored a key tenet of the current administration: a desire for a more balanced relationship with European allies. This isn’t simply about policy disagreements; it’s about a fundamental re-evaluation of the post-World War II order. The Secretary of State’s comments reflect a belief that the “euphoria” following the Cold War led to a “dangerous delusion” of borderless globalization and overreliance on international institutions. This sentiment suggests a move away from the traditional U.S. Role as a guarantor of global stability towards a model of shared responsibility.

The emphasis on reciprocity extends beyond defense spending, encompassing trade, migration and approaches to international governance. The recent dispute over Greenland, where President Trump briefly considered purchasing the territory, exemplifies this assertive approach. It highlights a willingness to challenge established norms and demand tangible benefits in exchange for continued U.S. Commitment.

European Responses: Independence and Interdependence

European leaders have responded to this evolving dynamic with a mix of reassurance and caution. While welcoming Rubio’s more conciliatory tone, figures like European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stressed the need for Europe to become “more independent,” particularly in areas like defense and digital sovereignty. This reflects a growing recognition that relying solely on the American security umbrella is no longer sustainable.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer echoed this sentiment, advocating for a re-forging of closer ties with Europe to foster “interdependence.” This suggests a shift towards a more collaborative approach, where Europe takes greater ownership of its security and economic future while maintaining a strong partnership with the U.S.

Beyond the Transatlantic: Global Implications

The reshaping of transatlantic relations has broader global implications. China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi, speaking at the Munich Security Conference, highlighted Beijing’s concerns about what it perceives as U.S. Efforts to “suppress and contain” its rise. This underscores the potential for a more multipolar world, where the U.S. And China compete for influence and Europe navigates a complex geopolitical landscape.

The conference likewise revealed differing perspectives on fundamental values. Rubio’s criticism of a “climate cult” and “mass migration” reflects a divergence from the priorities of many European leaders, who champion climate action and embrace more open migration policies. These differences highlight the challenges of forging a unified front on global issues.

The Path Forward: Repairing Trust and Building a New Consensus

Conference Chairman Wolfgang Ischinger aptly described the current situation as requiring “repair work” to rebuild trust and confidence between transatlantic partners. This will necessitate open dialogue, a willingness to compromise, and a shared commitment to addressing common challenges. The U.S. Must demonstrate a genuine understanding of European concerns, while Europe must acknowledge the legitimacy of American demands for reciprocity.

The future of the transatlantic alliance hinges on the ability of both sides to adapt to a changing world and forge a new consensus based on mutual respect and shared interests. The path forward will not be easy, but the stakes are too high to allow the relationship to drift further apart.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the main message of Marco Rubio’s speech?
A: Rubio’s speech aimed to reassure allies while reaffirming the Trump administration’s commitment to reshaping the transatlantic alliance based on principles of “seriousness and reciprocity.”

Q: What does “reciprocity” indicate in this context?
A: Reciprocity refers to the U.S. Expectation that European allies will contribute more equitably to shared security and economic burdens, and align more closely with U.S. Policy priorities.

Q: How is Europe responding to these demands?
A: European leaders are seeking greater independence in areas like defense and digital sovereignty while also emphasizing the importance of maintaining a strong partnership with the U.S.

Q: What are the broader implications of these changes?
A: The reshaping of transatlantic relations could lead to a more multipolar world, with increased competition between the U.S. And China and a more assertive Europe.

Pro Tip: Staying informed about geopolitical shifts is crucial for businesses operating internationally. Regularly monitor news from reliable sources and consider the potential impact of policy changes on your operations.

Did you know? The Munich Security Conference has been a key forum for transatlantic dialogue since 1963, bringing together world leaders to discuss pressing security challenges.

Explore more insights into international relations and global affairs on our website. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates and analysis.

February 14, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Business

The massive rule change that could save you pain at the airport when flying with Jetstar

by Chief Editor February 14, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Jetstar’s Baggage Rethink: Is a Weight-Free Future for Carry-On Luggage on the Horizon?

Jetstar is considering a significant shift in its carry-on baggage policy, potentially moving away from weight restrictions to size-based limits – a first for Australian airlines. This comes as passengers face hefty fees, sometimes exceeding $110, for exceeding the current 7kg limit at the boarding gate.

The Pain Point of Carry-On Weight Limits

For budget airlines like Jetstar, baggage fees represent a substantial revenue stream. However, the current weight-based system is proving to be a source of frustration for travellers. Ted Knight, Jetstar’s head of network and fleet, acknowledges this, describing the pre-flight weighing anxiety as a “pain point.” The airline is actively exploring alternatives to alleviate this stress.

Size Over Weight: A US Model for Australian Skies?

Jetstar is looking to US airlines for inspiration. In the US, some carriers restrict carry-on baggage by size rather than weight. This approach focuses on ensuring bags fit within overhead locker dimensions, potentially streamlining the boarding process and reducing delays. Implementing this in Australia would be a novel approach.

Pro Tip: Always check your airline’s specific baggage allowance before you travel. Fees can vary significantly, and pre-purchasing extra allowance is almost always cheaper than paying at the gate.

The Balancing Act: Aircraft Weight and Safety

Any changes to carry-on policies must consider crucial safety factors. Aircraft have strict maximum capture-off weight limits, encompassing fuel, crew, passengers, supplies, and baggage. Incorrect weight distribution can compromise flight control. Jetstar must carefully balance passenger convenience with these essential safety regulations.

Current Jetstar Carry-On Allowance: A Quick Guide

Currently, Jetstar’s standard allowance includes one larger carry-on item (56 x 36 x 23 cm) and one smaller item. The combined weight limit is 7kg on basic fares. Passengers can increase this to 14kg by pre-purchasing an extra 7kg allowance, costing $60 on domestic flights and $85 on international routes. Overweight bags at the gate incur fees of $85 (domestic) and $110 (international).

Beyond Jetstar: The Broader Trend in Airline Baggage Policies

Jetstar’s review reflects a wider industry trend of airlines scrutinizing baggage policies. Airlines are constantly seeking ways to optimize revenue and improve the passenger experience. The debate often centers on finding the right balance between ancillary fees and customer satisfaction.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if my carry-on is overweight on Jetstar?
You’ll be required to check the bag and pay a fee: $85 for domestic flights and $110 for international flights.
Can I bring a musical instrument on board?
Small instruments under 7kg and within specific dimensions (85 x 36 x 23 cm) are permitted as carry-on. Larger instruments may require an extra seat purchase.
Is it cheaper to pre-purchase extra baggage allowance?
Yes, pre-purchasing extra allowance is significantly cheaper than paying overweight fees at the gate.
Did you know? Business Class passengers on Jetstar are allowed a more generous carry-on allowance – two larger items plus a small item, with a combined weight limit of 14kg.

Want to stay informed about the latest travel news and airline updates? Subscribe to our newsletter for exclusive insights and expert advice.

February 14, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Entertainment

“Single’s Inferno 5” “Choiker” End Game Couple Ends In A Mess

by Chief Editor February 14, 2026
written by Chief Editor

The “Single’s Inferno” Fallout: When Reality TV Romance Turns Sour

The aftermath of Single’s Inferno 5 is proving to be more dramatic than the show itself. Final couple Song Seung Il and Kim Min Gee’s post-show updates have sparked a firestorm of commentary, with viewers accusing Seung Il of misleading Min Gee and ultimately ghosting her. The situation highlights a growing trend: the often-disparate narratives that emerge when reality TV relationships attempt to transition into the real world.

A Tale of Two Accounts

During the reunion segment, Seung Il stated that he and Min Gee had “talked a bit” after filming concluded and mutually decided to remain friends. However, Min Gee presented a starkly different account, describing it as a “single-sided reach out” on her part. This discrepancy immediately raised red flags for viewers, who quickly took to social media to express their disappointment and frustration.

The contrast in their stories has led many to believe Seung Il wasn’t genuinely interested in pursuing a relationship with Min Gee beyond the confines of the show. One Twitter user summarized the sentiment, stating Seung Il “played in her face.”

Ghosting and Ambiguity: The New Relationship Red Flags

Seung Il’s claim of a mutual decision to be friends, while Min Gee expressed uncertainty about the relationship’s status, has been widely interpreted as ghosting. This behavior resonates with a broader societal trend of ambiguous relationship endings, particularly common in the age of digital communication. Instead of direct conversations, individuals may opt for fading out or offering vague explanations, leaving the other party confused and hurt.

This situation also underscores the challenges of translating the intense, manufactured environment of a reality TV show into a sustainable real-life connection. The pressure of maintaining a public image, coupled with the lack of genuine privacy, can strain even the most promising relationships.

The Rise of Reality TV Relationship Scrutiny

Viewers are increasingly critical of the authenticity of relationships formed on reality television. Social media provides a platform for dissecting every interaction, analyzing body language, and questioning motives. This heightened scrutiny can put immense pressure on couples and contribute to their eventual breakup. The Single’s Inferno case is just the latest example of this phenomenon.

Another Twitter user expressed their disapproval of Seung Il’s actions, stating he “led her on and then ghosted her just for the fame.” This sentiment reflects a growing cynicism towards reality TV stars who are perceived as prioritizing fame and social media engagement over genuine connection.

The Future of Reality TV Romance

What does this imply for the future of reality TV relationships? Several trends are likely to emerge:

  • Increased Transparency: Viewers will demand greater transparency from couples regarding their relationship status and motivations.
  • More Realistic Expectations: Audiences will likely lower their expectations for long-term success, recognizing the inherent challenges of forming lasting connections in a highly artificial environment.
  • Focus on Individual Growth: Reality TV may shift its focus from solely showcasing romantic relationships to highlighting the personal growth and self-discovery of contestants.
  • Post-Show Support: Networks may offer more comprehensive support to couples navigating the transition to life after the show, including relationship counseling and media training.

FAQ

Q: What exactly is “ghosting”?

A: Ghosting is ending a relationship by suddenly stopping all communication without explanation.

Q: Is it common for reality TV couples to break up?

A: Yes, it is very common. The pressures of fame and the artificial environment of the show often contribute to breakups.

Q: What is a “choiker” in the context of Single’s Inferno?

A: “Choiker” is a portmanteau of “choice” and “maker,” referring to the final couple selected at the end of the show.

Did you recognize? Studies show that relationships formed under stressful conditions, like those on reality TV shows, have a lower success rate than those formed in more natural settings.

Pro Tip: When evaluating a potential partner, pay attention to their communication style and how they handle conflict. These are key indicators of long-term compatibility.

What are your thoughts on the Min Gee and Seung Il situation? Share your opinions in the comments below! Don’t forget to explore more articles on our site for the latest in Korean entertainment news and relationship advice.

d, without any additional comments or text.
[/gpt3]

February 14, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Sport

FA Cup: Man City vs Salford – A Remarkable Journey

by Chief Editor February 14, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Salford City’s Valiant Effort Signals a Shift in FA Cup Dynamics

Salford City’s performance against Manchester City on Saturday, February 14, 2026, wasn’t about the 2-0 scoreline. It was about a League Two side pushing a European powerhouse to bring on their “big guns” – Rodri, Semenyo, O’Reilly, and Guehi – in the final 20 minutes. This illustrates a growing trend: lower league teams are becoming increasingly competitive, forcing Premier League clubs to capture the FA Cup seriously even during congested schedules.

The Rise of Tactical Flexibility in Lower Leagues

Karl Robinson, Salford’s manager, highlighted the defensive performance as a “benchmark to move forward.” This isn’t simply post-match rhetoric. Teams like Salford are investing in tactical awareness and defensive organization, making them far more difficult to break down than in previous years. The ability to “prevent their opponents from registering an attempt on target before half-time,” as reported, demonstrates this evolution. This isn’t about luck; it’s about coaching and player development.

The fact that Salford’s players stayed on the pitch for five minutes after the final whistle to acknowledge their travelling fans speaks volumes about the team’s spirit and the importance of the occasion. This level of dedication and fan engagement is becoming a hallmark of successful lower league clubs.

The Impact of Loan Systems and Player Development

Salford’s recent acquisitions, Alfie Dorrington and Prince Ehibhatiomhan, and Dorrington’s loan arrival, exemplify a key strategy for lower league clubs: leveraging loan systems and focusing on player development. These moves allow teams to bring in talent without significant financial outlay, improving squad depth and competitiveness. Michael Brown, observing for BBC Sport, noted Salford will “learn from Saturday’s experience,” suggesting a long-term vision focused on growth.

Guardiola’s Frustration: A Sign of Changing Times?

Pep Guardiola’s description of the match as “boring” is telling. It suggests that even dominant teams are finding it harder to effortlessly overcome determined lower league opposition. This forces managers to adapt their strategies and potentially risk key players in a competition often viewed as secondary to league and European commitments. The necessitate to bring on multiple first-team players late in the game underscores this point.

FA Cup as a Benchmark for League Two Ambitions

Robinson’s focus on using the game as a “benchmark” is crucial. For League Two clubs, the FA Cup isn’t just about potential financial rewards; it’s about measuring themselves against the best and attracting attention to their players. The aim, as Robinson stated, is to “get out of League Two,” and performances like this can provide the momentum and belief needed to achieve that goal.

FAQ

Q: Was this a typical FA Cup result?
A: Although Manchester City won, the game was more competitive than many expected, highlighting a trend of lower league teams posing a greater challenge.

Q: What did Pep Guardiola say about the game?
A: Guardiola described the match as “boring,” indicating his frustration with the difficulty of breaking down Salford’s defense.

Q: What is Salford City’s league position?
A: Salford City currently sits sixth in the fourth tier of English football (League Two).

Q: What is the significance of the player acquisitions for Salford?
A: The signings of Alfie Dorrington and Prince Ehibhatiomhan, along with Dorrington’s loan, demonstrate a strategy of leveraging loan systems and player development.

Did you know? Salford went close to scoring twice in the first half through Ben Woodburn and Brandon Cooper.

Pro Tip: Lower league teams are increasingly focusing on defensive organization and tactical flexibility to compete with higher-ranked opponents.

Enjoyed this analysis? Explore more articles on football tactics and player development on our site. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest insights delivered directly to your inbox!

February 14, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health

Researchers warn climate-linked disease leptospirosis spreading south

by Chief Editor February 14, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Leptospirosis: A Growing Threat in Australia’s Changing Climate

A deadly bacterial disease, leptospirosis, is becoming increasingly prevalent across Australia, particularly impacting rural and agricultural communities. Once considered largely confined to the tropical north, new research indicates the disease is spreading southward, posing a growing risk to public health and livestock.

What is Leptospirosis?

Leptospirosis is a zoonotic disease, meaning it can be transmitted from animals to humans. It spreads through the urine and faeces of infected animals – including rodents, cattle, and pigs – and contaminated soil or water. Infection occurs through contact with these sources, even through minor cuts or muddy puddles.

A Personal Battle with the Disease

Sylvia Morris, a veterinary science student, experienced the severity of leptospirosis firsthand. What began as a cold quickly escalated to pneumonia, ultimately leading to a diagnosis of the bacterial infection. She endured a two-week course of antibiotics and six months of recovery from extreme fatigue, noting her liver was significantly affected. “But it can be just a muddy puddle or having a cut that becomes an issue,” she explained.

Global Impact and Rising Cases

Leptospirosis is a significant global health concern, with approximately 1 million cases and nearly 60,000 deaths reported annually worldwide. The disease is one of the leading causes of zoonotic illness globally, according to the US Centre for Disease Control.

The Southern Spread and Climate Change Link

Research led by the University of New England reveals a concerning trend: outbreaks are occurring further south, particularly in New South Wales. Associate Professor Jacqueline Epps, a rural GP, notes, “We have seen over time more outbreaks heading further south, particularly in New South Wales.” This shift is linked to more frequent storms and flooding associated with climate change, increasing the risk of exposure.

Rats, Mice, and Recent Outbreaks

Recent outbreaks highlight the role of rodents in disease transmission. A 2018 outbreak on a NSW berry farm affected up to 84 workers exposed to contaminated fruit after rat urine contamination. Infections also surged during recent mouse plagues. Dr. Epps emphasizes, “The most common form of transmission is from mice and rats and that’s new.” The bacteria can survive for months in the environment, complicating detection in livestock.

Challenges in Diagnosis and Treatment

Leptospirosis symptoms often mimic influenza or COVID-19, leading to misdiagnosis or delayed treatment. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial to prevent severe complications like organ failure and meningitis. Whereas dairy farmers routinely vaccinate cattle, there is currently no human vaccine, and treatment relies on prompt antibiotic administration.

Impact on Agriculture

The agricultural sector faces significant risks. The disease can cause abortion storms in cattle herds, resulting in substantial economic losses. A New Zealand report estimated the cost to their cattle, sheep, and deer industry at US$8 million annually, with an additional US$6 million spent on preventative cattle vaccinations.

What Can Be Done?

Experts are calling for increased public testing, further research, and greater vigilance. Australia hasn’t conducted human prevalence studies since 2011. Preventative measures include avoiding floodwater, covering cuts, reducing rodent exposure, and taking precautions in high-risk occupations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the symptoms of leptospirosis? Symptoms can include fever, headache, muscle aches, vomiting, and jaundice. It often begins with flu-like symptoms.

How is leptospirosis diagnosed? Diagnosis typically involves blood or urine tests to detect the presence of the bacteria or antibodies.

Is leptospirosis treatable? Yes, leptospirosis is treatable with antibiotics, especially when administered early in the course of the illness.

Can leptospirosis be prevented? Preventative measures include avoiding contact with potentially contaminated water or soil, controlling rodent populations, and wearing protective clothing in high-risk environments.

Did you know? Leptospirosis can survive for months in contaminated water and soil, making environmental control crucial.

Pro Tip: If you work in agriculture or spend time outdoors in rural areas, be extra vigilant about protecting yourself from potential exposure.

Stay informed about leptospirosis and seize steps to protect yourself and your community. Share this article with others to raise awareness about this growing health threat.

February 14, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Tech

Fedora made me realize Windows was the problem with my workflow

by Chief Editor February 14, 2026
written by Chief Editor

From Windows Woes to Linux Zen: Why More Users Are Making the Switch

There are moments that redefine your tech experience. Upgrading to a dual-monitor setup, or adopting a password manager like Bitwarden, are prime examples. But for some, the biggest shift comes from changing operating systems entirely. The move from Windows to Linux, particularly distributions like Fedora, is proving to be a revelation for users seeking greater control, stability, and a fundamentally different approach to computing.

The Update Struggle: Windows vs. Linux

One of the most immediate benefits users experience when switching to Linux is control over updates. Windows has long been criticized for its often-intrusive update schedule, forcing reboots at inconvenient times and occasionally introducing instability. Linux, empowers users to choose when to update. Distributions like Fedora even offer Long Term Support (LTS) versions for those who prioritize stability over the latest features. This flexibility is a game-changer for professionals and anyone who values uninterrupted workflow.

Fedora Kinoite: Atomic Design and Immutability

Fedora Kinoite takes this control a step further with its atomic design and immutable file system. Traditional operating systems allow modifications to system files, which can lead to corruption or instability over time. Kinoite prevents this by treating the operating system as a read-only entity. Updates are applied by downloading a complete new system image, which is then swapped in on reboot. This process is remarkably fast and ensures a pristine system state, eliminating the risk of “system rot.”

This approach, while different, offers significant advantages. It prevents the scenario where a partial update leaves the system in a broken state. It also enhances security by making it more hard for malware to modify critical system files.

Beyond Updates: A Different Philosophy

The benefits of Fedora extend beyond just updates and system stability. Many users describe a fundamental shift in how they perceive their operating system. Unlike Windows, which increasingly feels like a product focused on monetization, Fedora feels like a true operating system built for the user.

This difference is reflected in Fedora’s development model. It’s a community-driven project, with contributions from developers worldwide. New features are thoroughly tested by a dedicated user base before being incorporated into stable releases. This collaborative approach results in a more refined and reliable operating system.

The Red Hat Connection: A Sustainable Ecosystem

Fedora’s relationship with Red Hat is also a key factor in its success. Fedora serves as an upstream testing ground for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), a commercially supported distribution used by businesses worldwide. This creates a virtuous cycle: Fedora users get access to the latest innovations, while Red Hat benefits from the community’s feedback, and contributions. The revenue generated from RHEL then funds further development of Fedora, ensuring its long-term sustainability.

KDE Plasma: A Customizable and Feature-Rich Desktop

Fedora Kinoite utilizes the KDE Plasma desktop environment, known for its extensive customization options and rich feature set. Unlike the more restrictive interfaces of some other operating systems, KDE Plasma allows users to tailor the desktop to their exact preferences. It also includes a wealth of built-in tools and utilities, reducing the require for third-party applications. The KDE project itself prioritizes user experience and avoids intrusive monetization tactics, with a yearly fundraiser being the primary source of support.

Is Linux Right for You?

Switching to Linux isn’t without its learning curve. Users accustomed to Windows may need to adapt to a different way of doing things. However, the benefits – greater control, stability, security, and a more user-centric approach – are increasingly compelling. For those seeking an alternative to the Windows ecosystem, Fedora Kinoite offers a compelling and refreshing experience.

Secure Your Digital Life with Bitwarden

Protect your passwords and sensitive information with the leading open-source password manager.

FAQ

  • Is Linux difficult to learn? While there’s a learning curve, modern distributions like Fedora are designed to be user-friendly.
  • Will I be able to run my existing Windows applications? Some Windows applications can be run on Linux using compatibility layers like Wine, but not all.
  • Is Linux secure? Linux is generally considered to be very secure, thanks to its open-source nature and strong community support.
  • Is Fedora free? Yes, Fedora is completely free to download and use.
February 14, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Entertainment

Michael Douglas i Kirkenes – Overraskende pubbesøk

by Chief Editor February 14, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Hollywood Comes to the Arctic

Michael Douglas’s Unexpected Visit to a Norwegian Pub Signals a Growing Trend: Remote Location Filming and Celebrity Tourism

A special encounter: Pub1 owner Remi Johansen with Michael Douglas. Photo: Remi Johansen

When Michael Douglas, a celebrated actor with decades of experience, unexpectedly appeared at Pub1 in Kirkenes, Norway, it wasn’t just a starstruck moment for owner Remi Johansen. It was a glimpse into a burgeoning trend: the allure of remote locations for both film production and unique travel experiences.

The Rise of Remote Filming Locations

Douglas’s visit, alongside director Harald Zwart, hints at a potential scouting mission for a new film project. This aligns with a broader industry shift. Increasingly, filmmakers are looking beyond traditional studio settings and established locations. The desire for authenticity, coupled with advancements in portable filming technology, is driving this change.

The appeal is multifaceted. Remote locations offer visual distinctiveness, often at a lower cost than major metropolitan areas. Norway, with its dramatic landscapes, is becoming increasingly popular. The country’s film incentive program further encourages international productions.

Celebrity Tourism: Beyond the Red Carpet

Douglas’s choice of destination also speaks to a growing trend in celebrity tourism. While glamorous events and luxury resorts remain popular, there’s a rising interest in more off-the-beaten-path experiences. Douglas was recently spotted in Antarctica, demonstrating a willingness to venture beyond typical celebrity hotspots.

This shift is fueled by social media, where celebrities share their authentic travel experiences, inspiring fans to follow suit. It also reflects a desire for privacy and a break from the constant scrutiny of public life.

The Local Impact

For communities like Kirkenes, a visit from a Hollywood star can provide a significant economic boost. The increased foot traffic to local businesses, like Pub1, generates revenue and raises the profile of the region. The potential for a film production to utilize local resources and talent further amplifies these benefits.

Remi Johansen noted Douglas encouraged patrons to return the following evening, demonstrating a genuine interest in engaging with the local community. This type of interaction fosters positive relationships and creates lasting memories.

The Future of Film and Travel

The convergence of remote filming and celebrity tourism is likely to continue. As the demand for unique content and authentic experiences grows, we can expect to see more stars venturing off the beaten path and more filmmakers seeking out unconventional locations. This presents opportunities for smaller communities to capitalize on their natural beauty and cultural heritage.

The success of productions filmed in remote areas, coupled with the positive publicity generated by celebrity visits, can attract further investment and tourism, creating a virtuous cycle of economic growth.

Douglas recently visited Antarctica, showcasing a trend of celebrities seeking unique travel experiences. Photo: @michaelkirkdouglas/Instagram

Did you know? Michael Douglas won an Oscar for Best Film as producer of “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest” (1975) and Best Actor for “Wall Street” (1988).

The visit to Pub1 wasn’t just a fleeting encounter; it was a testament to the power of unexpected connections and the growing appeal of venturing beyond the ordinary.

– Dette var stort – veldig stort. Har du sett litt film skal det ikke mye til før du vet hvem disse to er, says Remi Johansen.

February 14, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
World

US Prepares for Weeks-Long Military Operation Against Iran: Trump on Alert

by Chief Editor February 14, 2026
written by Chief Editor

US Prepares for Potential Prolonged Military Operation Against Iran

The United States military is reportedly preparing for a potential, weeks-long military operation against Iran, should President Donald Trump order it. This preparation, according to US officials, automatically elevates the risk surrounding ongoing diplomatic efforts between Washington and Tehran.

Diplomacy and Military Buildup: A Contradictory Approach

Despite recent diplomatic talks between US and Iranian diplomats in Oman aimed at reviving discussions regarding Iran’s nuclear program, the US is simultaneously increasing its military presence in the region. This dual approach has raised concerns about a potential new military action.

The Pentagon dispatched an additional aircraft carrier to the Middle East last Friday, accompanied by thousands of troops, fighter jets, missile destroyer ships, and other combat forces capable of launching and defending against attacks.

Trump’s Stance: Fear as a Negotiating Tactic

President Trump acknowledged the difficulty of reaching an agreement with Iran, stating, “Sometimes you have to have fear. That’s the only thing that really gets people to handle the situation.” He has repeatedly threatened to bomb Iran due to concerns over its nuclear program, ballistic missile development, and internal suppression of dissent.

White House Response: All Options on the Table

White House spokesperson Anna Kelly affirmed that President Trump retains full control over any potential actions against Iran. She stated he is considering various perspectives but will ultimately make decisions based on the best interests of the nation and its national security.

Past Military Actions and Current Planning

Last year, the US deployed two aircraft carriers to the region during an attack on Iranian nuclear sites. Operation “Midnight Hammer” in June involved stealth bombers striking a nuclear facility, prompting a limited retaliatory response from Iran against US bases in Qatar. However, current planning for a potential operation is described as far more complex.

This potential military campaign would target not only nuclear infrastructure but likewise other Iranian state and security facilities. Experts warn that the risk to US forces would be significantly higher due to Iran’s substantial missile arsenal, and any retaliatory strikes could escalate the conflict regionally.

Iran’s Warning: Retaliation Against US Bases

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has warned that any attack on Iranian territory would be met with retaliation against US military bases throughout the Middle East, including those in Jordan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, and Turkey.

International Considerations and Israeli Concerns

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, during a meeting with Trump in Washington, emphasized the importance of key security points for Israel in any potential agreement with Iran. Iran has expressed willingness to discuss limitations on its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief but remains unwilling to link this issue to its missile program.

Trump’s Ultimatum: “Very Traumatic Consequences”

President Trump has warned of “very traumatic consequences” if no nuclear deal is reached with Iran.

FAQ

Q: Is a military conflict with Iran imminent?
A: While the US is preparing for a potential military operation, diplomatic efforts are still ongoing. The situation remains fluid and unpredictable.

Q: What are Iran’s potential responses to a US attack?
A: Iran has warned of retaliatory strikes against US military bases in the region.

Q: What is the US seeking to achieve with its current approach?
A: The US aims to pressure Iran into negotiating a more comprehensive deal regarding its nuclear program and other security concerns.

Q: What role is Israel playing in this situation?
A: Israel is emphasizing its security concerns to the US during negotiations with Iran.

Did you know? The “Midnight Hammer” operation in June involved a single strike, whereas current planning suggests a more prolonged and comprehensive military campaign.

Pro Tip: Stay informed about developments in US-Iran relations by following reputable news sources and analysis from foreign policy experts.

Explore more articles on international relations and geopolitical risks on our website. Click here to learn more.

February 14, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Business

Sudan: UN Pushes for Immediate Ceasefire as Conflict Rages On

by Chief Editor February 14, 2026
written by Chief Editor

Sudan’s Escalating Crisis: UN Intensifies Push for Ceasefire

The United Nations, alongside the African Union (AU) and the Arab League, is actively working to secure an immediate ceasefire in Sudan. This comes as the conflict between the Sudanese army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) continues to rage, marked by accusations of atrocities against both sides.

A Humanitarian Catastrophe Unfolding

Since April 2023, Sudan has been gripped by a devastating war. The conflict has already claimed tens of thousands of lives and displaced approximately 11 million people, creating what the UN describes as the “worst humanitarian crisis in the world.” The scale of suffering is immense, with widespread reports of food insecurity, lack of access to healthcare, and displacement.

International Pressure Mounts

UN Secretary-General António Guterres, speaking at the annual AU summit in Addis Ababa, emphasized the commitment to exert “effective pressure” for an immediate ceasefire. This involves active engagement with the AU, the Arab League, the Quad (comprising the US, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Egypt), and other key stakeholders. Guterres highlighted the need to pressure all parties involved, including those providing support and arms, both within and outside the African continent.

The Secretary-General indicated a focus on influencing those fueling the conflict, without providing specific details. The United Arab Emirates has repeatedly faced accusations of supplying weapons, personnel, and fuel to the RSF, allegations the monarchy consistently denies despite mounting evidence from international reports and independent investigations.

Regional Instability: Ethiopia-Eritrea Tensions

Beyond Sudan, Guterres also addressed rising tensions between Ethiopia and Eritrea, neighboring countries in the Horn of Africa. These nations have experienced a fraught relationship, marked by a deadly war between 1998 and 2000, and recent mutual accusations of destabilization attempts. Eritrea gained its independence from Ethiopia in 1993 after decades of armed struggle.

Guterres expressed hope for reconciliation between Ethiopia and Eritrea, believing that improved relations would contribute to peace and stability across the continent. He acknowledged their shared history of conflict, emphasizing the potential for a more peaceful future.

Looking Ahead: Challenges to Peace

The situation in Sudan remains incredibly complex. Securing a lasting ceasefire will require sustained international pressure, a commitment from all parties to prioritize civilian protection, and a comprehensive approach to address the root causes of the conflict. The involvement of regional actors and the potential for spillover effects into neighboring countries add further layers of complexity.

The Secretary-General, who will be leaving his position at the end of the year, leaves a challenging landscape. His continued advocacy for peace and humanitarian access will be crucial in the coming months.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the current situation in Sudan? Sudan is experiencing a civil war between the Sudanese army and the RSF, resulting in a major humanitarian crisis.

What is the UN’s role in the Sudan conflict? The UN is actively working with the AU and Arab League to pressure for an immediate ceasefire and provide humanitarian assistance.

What are the concerns regarding Ethiopia and Eritrea? Rising tensions between Ethiopia and Eritrea are raising fears of a new conflict in the Horn of Africa.

Who is António Guterres? António Guterres is the ninth Secretary-General of the United Nations, having assumed office on January 1, 2017.

What is the Quad? The Quad is a group of countries – the United States, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Egypt – working to address the Sudan conflict.

Pro Tip: Stay informed about the crisis in Sudan by following updates from the UN and reputable news organizations.

Did you know? The conflict in Sudan has displaced more people in a shorter period than almost any other conflict in recent history.

What are your thoughts on the situation in Sudan? Share your comments below and join the conversation.

February 14, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Recent Posts

  • Who pays for Newsom’s travel? Hint: It’s not always taxpayers

    February 14, 2026
  • Rubio’s speech to European allies strikes reassuring tone but sticks to Trump’s firm stance

    February 14, 2026
  • The massive rule change that could save you pain at the airport when flying with Jetstar

    February 14, 2026
  • “Single’s Inferno 5” “Choiker” End Game Couple Ends In A Mess

    February 14, 2026
  • FA Cup: Man City vs Salford – A Remarkable Journey

    February 14, 2026

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Maya Jama flaunts her taut midriff in a white crop top and denim jeans during holiday as she shares New York pub crawl story

    April 5, 2025
  • 2

    Saar-Unternehmen hoffen auf tiefgreifende Reformen

    March 26, 2025
  • 3

    Marta Daddato: vita e racconti tra YouTube e podcast

    April 7, 2025
  • 4

    Unlocking Success: Why the FPÖ Could Outperform Projections and Transform Austria’s Political Landscape

    April 26, 2025
  • 5

    Mecimapro Apologizes for DAY6 Concert Chaos: Understanding the Controversy

    May 6, 2025

Follow Me

Follow Me
  • Cookie Policy
  • CORRECTIONS POLICY
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF SERVICE

Hosted by Byohosting – Most Recommended Web Hosting – for complains, abuse, advertising contact: o f f i c e @byohosting.com


Back To Top
Newsy Today
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • World