President Donald Trump has announced plans to scale back the Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments in Utah, reviving a policy battle over federal land management that has shifted between administrations for years. According to the Associated Press, these actions seek to undo proclamations made by his predecessors, including President Joe Biden, who had previously restored the full boundaries of the monuments to protect their cultural and scientific significance under the Antiquities Act.
The Legal Precedent Behind Monument Adjustments
The authority to designate and alter monuments stems from the Antiquities Act of 1906, a law signed by President Theodore Roosevelt to prevent the looting of cultural artifacts. While environmental groups argue that the act is a “one-way road” intended only for protection, history shows a pattern of presidential resizing. According to a National Park Service database, presidents have issued more than a dozen proclamations diminishing monuments since 1912.
Past executive actions include:
- Woodrow Wilson: Reduced the acreage of Mount Olympus National Park by roughly half.
- Harry Truman: Diminished the size of Santa Rosa Island National Monument.
- Dwight Eisenhower: Diminished six monuments including Arches in Utah, Great Sand Dunes in Colorado, and Glacier Bay in Alaska.
Did you know?
The Antiquities Act was first used in 1906 to protect Devils Tower in Wyoming. Theodore Roosevelt utilized the law to preserve the site, which is both a geological wonder formed by cooling lava and a location of ongoing significance for Native American tribes.
Diverging Philosophies on Land Management
The debate over Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante centers on the definition of public land use. Proponents of downsizing argue that current protective boundaries are overly restrictive, preventing the extraction of critical minerals and other natural resources. Conversely, supporters of the monuments emphasize the protection of sacred Native American sites, prehistoric fossils, and unique landscapes.
The management of these areas differs significantly from National Parks, which are established by Congress. National monuments are often created by presidential proclamation and are governed by various agencies, including the Bureau of Land Management and the National Park Service. While National Parks operate under the 1916 Organic Act—which mandates the conservation of scenery and wildlife for future generations—other federal lands, such as those managed by the U.S. Forest Service, are often balanced for multiple uses including timber, livestock grazing, and mineral extraction.
Recent Presidential Actions
President Biden’s approach to the Antiquities Act focused on expansion and new designations. During his term, he restored the Utah monuments and established 10 new sites, including a monument honoring Emmett Till and his mother, Mamie Till-Mobley, and a site commemorating the 1908 race riot in Springfield, Illinois. In contrast, President Trump’s first term included a limited number of proclamations, primarily focused on the Utah reductions and the creation of the 340-acre Camp Nelson National Monument in Kentucky, which preserves a Civil War-era hospital and recruiting center for African American troops.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a president legally eliminate a national monument?
While the Antiquities Act allows presidents to create monuments, the question of whether they can reduce or eliminate them remains a subject of legal and political contention. Despite arguments from environmental groups that the act is non-reversible, historical data shows multiple presidents have reduced monument sizes since 1912.
How do national monuments differ from national forests?
National forests are typically managed for multiple uses, including logging, water resources, and private mineral leasing. National monuments, by contrast, are designated specifically to protect cultural, historic, or scientific features, often resulting in strict bans on mining, drilling, and new construction.
Who manages these federal lands?
Management responsibility varies by site. Agencies such as the National Park Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration oversee national monuments, while the U.S. Forest Service manages over 300,000 square miles of forest and grassland.
What are your thoughts on the balance between resource extraction and land preservation? Join the conversation by leaving a comment below or subscribe to our newsletter for ongoing updates on federal land policy.
